• About Us
    • What Is Street Harassment?
    • Why Stopping Street Harassment Matters
    • Meet the Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Past Board Members
    • In The Media
  • Our Work
    • National Street Harassment Hotline
    • International Anti-Street Harassment Week
    • Blog Correspondents
      • Past SSH Correspondents
    • Safe Public Spaces Mentoring Program
    • Publications
    • National Studies
    • Campaigns against Companies
    • Washington, D.C. Activism
  • Our Books
  • Donate
  • Store

Stop Street Harassment

Making Public Spaces Safe and Welcoming

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Home
  • Blog
    • Harassment Stories
    • Blog Correspondents
    • Street Respect Stories
  • Help & Advice
    • National Street Harassment Hotline
    • Dealing With Harassers
      • Assertive Responses
      • Reporting Harassers
      • Bystander Responses
      • Creative Responses
    • What to Do Before or After Harassment
    • Street Harassment and the Law
  • Resources
    • Definitions
    • Statistics
    • Articles & Books
    • Anti-Harassment Groups & Campaigns
    • Male Allies
      • Educating Boys & Men
      • How to Talk to Women
      • Bystander Tips
    • Video Clips
    • Images & Flyers
  • Take Community Action
  • Contact

Brazil: Women’s Issues are Absent from Public Policy in Rio de Janeiro

May 15, 2017 By Correspondent

Yasmin Curzi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, SSH Blog Correspondent

An Oct. 2016 protest against a series of legislative initiatives passed by male deputies that reduced women’s rights. Credit:  Matias Maxx.

Rio de Janeiro is the second largest city in Brazil with over 6 million inhabitants and while more than half are women, there is not much incorporation of gender in the public policy.

Democracy in Brazil is a delicate theme. In short, we have been under several dictatorships in our recent history and the political system is mostly formed by oligarchies. After the struggles of democratic transition in the late 1980’s, our modern Federal Constitution – also known as “Civic Constitution” – reflected a lot of social movement’s concerns and intended to amplify decision-making procedures to the civil society. Still, the Civic Constitution is not effective enough to change the concentration of political and economical power held in the hands of a few rich white men, men who still predominantly run the public institutions.

Photo Credit: Matias Maxx.

As a result of Brazil’s historical exclusion of women (they are misrepresented in the legislature and the decision making processes are failing to consider popular agendas), the main public institutions neglect women’s issues. This challenging scenario of gender inequality in politics inherently affects the public policy choices of the country.

In the past two decades, the Federal Government took important measures observing the platform that was defined at the World Conference on Women held in Beijing in 1995. Significantly, Beijing’s agenda observes the necessity of women’s empowerment by the opening of decision-making processes to their participation and the incorporation of gender’s perspective in all public policies. In order to attend these directions, the Brazilian Federal Secretariat for Women’s Policies was created in 2013. It plays a key role encouraging states and municipal administrations to create and implement public policies that reduce inequalities between women and men. The “National Plan of Women’s Policies” formulated by this Federal Secretariat serves as an orientation guide to others federal entities that should, in turn, create more specific measures aiming to attend women’s particular needs in their locations. However, until today, Rio de Janeiro doesn’t have a Municipal Plan.

In Rio, gender inequality is mostly perceived by cases of material violence. According to the “Women Dossier”[1], women registered 56.031 occurrences of physical injuries in the year of 2014, and the estimate of domestic abuse is almost 80 daily cases. In cases of attempted murder, 33,8% of the defendants are the victim’s partners or ex-partners and 3,8% are the victim’s fathers or stepfathers. Even with these significant numbers, in the whole city there are only five attention houses for victims of domestic abuse. In this same year, 4.725 women registered occurrence for rape. And we can say that these data are under-representative, as there are a lot of constraints that inhibit women from seeking institutional help. In cases of sexual harassment, rape or abuse, the institutions are often unwelcoming to the victims: police officers commonly question the victim’s behavior and even the creation of Rio de Janeiro’s Women Protection Police Precinct[2] isn’t effective to mitigate this scenario.

When it comes to street harassment, an online survey[3] of nearly 8,000 people conducted by the journalist Karin Hueck, a member of the NGO “Fiu Fiu Enough”, discovered that 99,6% of theses women had suffered some kind of harassment in public spaces at some point of their lives. They said it limits their freedoms, like clothing and mobility choices. 90% had said they changed their way of dressing because they feared suffering with harassment and 81% gave up the idea of going somewhere alone. Just 17% had said they liked the catcalls. Other research[4], conducted by the NGO ActionAid, interviewed 503 women[5] and 86% said they had experienced street harassment. Even with this clear evidence of a problem, there’s no public policy against street harassment.

In conclusion, the invisibility of women’s issues and the lack of appropriate treatment of their concerns stems from women’s under-representation in political institutions. Women need to be heard in the formulation and implementation of policies and programs that concern them. The fact that the city of Rio de Janeiro doesn’t have any public policy plan directed at women’s issues is a dramatic sign of the persistent situation of our exclusion from the public sphere. The oligarchies that constitute political power in Rio de Janeiro nowadays treat female matters as irrelevant and, apparently, don’t intend to expand the civil society channels. To overcome this scenario, women need to fight for their fair distribution of political power and occupy institutions of public life.

[1] A public research that reunites data about violence against women, published in 2015.

[2] This type of Precinct was created to give specialized attention to women. Although, there’re only 300 unities in a country that has 5.561 cities. The infrastructure of these precincts is also a questionable theme: mostly doesn’t have social assistants, neither psychologies, or orientation of women toward their rights.

[3] You can access the partial results from this survey in this link: http://thinkolga.com/2013/09/09/chega-de-fiu-fiu-resultado-da-pesquisa/

[4] You can access an article about this research in this link: http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/direitos-humanos/noticia/2016-05/survey-shows-86-brazilian-women-have-experienced-street-harassment

[5] The sample was constructed trying to reflect the Brazilian demographics, as exposed in the last census from Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE).

References:

CURZI, Yasmin and RADD, Carolina. “Política para Mulheres” in: “O Rio que Queremos: propostas para uma cidade inclusiva”. Disponible at: <http://www.grabois.org.br/uploads/arquivos/1484084673.pdf>

PINTO, Andréia Soares, MONTEIRO, Joana e MORAES, Orlinda Claudia R. “Dossiê Mulher”. Instituto de Segurança Pública – Rio de Janeiro, 2015. Available at: <http://arquivos.proderj.rj.gov.br/isp_imagens/uploads/DossieMulher2015.pdf>

Yasmin is a Research Assistant at the Center for Research on Law and Economics at FGV-Rio. She has a BA in Social Sciences from FGV-Rio and a Master Degree in Social Sciences from PUC-Rio, where she wrote her thesis on street harassment and feminists’ struggles for recognition.

Share

Filed Under: correspondents, street harassment

Share Your Story

Share your street harassment story for the blog. Donate Now

From the Blog

  • #MeToo 2024 Study Released Today
  • Join International Anti-Street Harassment Week 2022
  • Giving Tuesday – Fund the Hotline
  • Thank You – International Anti-Street Harassment Week 2021
  • Share Your Story – Safecity and Catcalls Collaboration

Buy the Book

Search

Archives

  • September 2024
  • March 2022
  • November 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008

Comment Policy

SSH will not publish any comment that is offensive or hateful and does not add to a thoughtful discussion of street harassment. Racism, homophobia, transphobia, disabalism, classism, and sexism will not be tolerated. Disclaimer: SSH may use any stories submitted to the blog in future scholarly publications on street harassment.
  • Contact
  • Events
  • Join Us
  • Donate
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 Stop Street Harassment · Website Design by Sarah Marie Lacy